This will indeed never be a problem with it framework; Sir John de- Keith d

Re: ? Comyn partner off Malise

About the Comyn child who was simply partner out of Malise out-of Strathearn, I’d theorized from inside the 2005 you to definitely she had been Margaret, recognized as partner off Sir John de- Keith (come across content off post less than) who was simply 2ndly age are given because post: new partner Emma I suggest is actually of some other nearest and dearest, and not mom of one’s second Earl Malise.

Scots Peerage, sub _Comyn, Earl from Buchan_ , says to some extent, ‘Malise, Earl away from Strathearn, got a wife Emma, inside the 1261-1267, whose surname is actually unfamiliar ‘[SP II:256, cites Cal. regarding Docs., i. 2383, 2451]. a little while ahead of 1270, making sure that his widow (Margaret) would-have-been « available » a bit shortly after Emma.

It was needless to say a conjecture; it can feel the benefit of dealing with a well-known relationship ranging from Muriel Keith and you will Reginald le Cheyne. Anymore associated documents manage without a doubt feel greet.

Brand new account in the Scots Peerage concerning the family of Keith says out-of Sir John de- Keith (d. ca. 1270) he is actually considered features hitched Comyn, earl of Buchan . It character, of the not sure (« considered had been ») assortment, are now able to feel corrected in accordance with the after the dispensation, dated on Fondi into the fourteen Jan 1378/9::

‘ Reg Aven 215, fifty For the bishop regarding Moray. Faculty to help you dispense Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and you may Murielle, damselle, d de- Keth, off Moray and you will Aberdeen dioceses, in the obstacle to relationships arising from the 3rd and fourth amounts of consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno step 1. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, zero. 46. ‘

Muriel Keith, the future 2nd spouse from Robert Stewart, first Duke out-of Albany (d. 1420), is actually developed in order to marry Reginald le Cheyne, young cherry blossoms dejting webbplats Г¶versyn buck off Sir Reginald ce Cheyne by the their spouse (given that her basic spouse), Helen from Strathearn. When you find yourself you can find known gaps from the origins regarding Muriel Keith, she and you will Reginald ce Cheyne do express a lineage in the Comyns. Yet not, this is certainly as well distant to need an excellent dispensation when the Muriel was an excellent-great-great grandd Comyn, Earl from Buchan (d. 1233), which could function as the circumstances if ‘s daughter.

2. Reginald le Cheyne is actually an effective-grandson out of Marjory Comyn, child of Alexander Comyn, Earl away from Buchan (d. 1290), son regarding William Comyn listed above. Their particular young buck is actually Malise, Earl of Strathearn out-of 1312 to help you their death inside 1328 , and you will pops of Reginald.

california. 1270), is actually same as Marjory Comyn, and you may hitched 2ndly to Malise, Earl out of Strathearn (d. 1312). This will mean the latest parentage a€?believed to enjoys been’ that Margaret, partner away from Sir John de Keith, is of you to age group: she’d n’t have started the brand new d Comyn, Earl off Buchan, but alternatively off their young buck Alexander. There’s no proof that Earl Malise and you can Marjory Comyn was in fact married much ahead of 1275: just like the Lindsay blogged,

There is one to discernable foundation about what the partnership ranging from Reginald ce Cheyne and Muriel Keith might have lived: if the Margaret Comyn, spouse out-of Sir John de- Keith (d

‘ The new wife on the earl, on 1275, is titled Marjory, while we see the attesting clause from Zero. curriculum vitae., and is stated by Wyntoun, Publication VIII. chap. vi., having already been next sister out-of John Comyn, Earl of Buchan, whom discussed with respect to Earl Malise the marriage payment more than mentioned [dated from the London, April twenty-six, 1293 getting their daughter Matilda and Robert de Tony, child regarding Ralph].’

Alexander Comyn = Elizabeth de- Quincy Age away from Buchan We __________________I________________ I III step 1) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de- Keith I (als I Elizabeth out-of Strathearn . 1270 I Margaret) I d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ I We I We We I Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de- Keith de- Keith Elizabeth out-of = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de- Tony We ______I_______________________ We We We I Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de E of Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. ca. 1343 We ce Cheyne We I I = 2) Sir David We V We I de- Graham Sir William de- We I__________ Keith I I = Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ We I We III I We We We Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith ce Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke out of Albany)

Comments ( 0 )

    Leave A Comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *