This study comprueba mi fuente desired in order to fill a gap on sexting and you may dating quality lookup by examining the connections anywhere between dating well-becoming (fulfillment and ambivalence), attachment properties, and you may sexting frequency one of married couples. In line with the extant books, it was predicted one:

Cellphone need full is gloomier among elderly communities regarding adults compared to young people. 5 Ergo, odds are the elderly are utilizing its devices reduced will than just teenagers so you can browse intimate dating. step three located a negative association ranging from sexting and you can relationships length, as well as the mediocre matchmaking length in the modern shot try requested is higher than that of most more youthful mature partners. Fundamentally, sexting is actually for the experience seeking to 10 and impulsivity. 19 Just like the previous neuroscience-told types of exposure delivering recommend that puberty is actually described as intellectual and you may neurological procedure you to definitely intensify high-risk behavior, 20 sexting frequency is actually expected to be lower in this older test.

In addition, with attention into before discover backlinks anywhere between connection and you may sexting, eleven,sixteen therefore the nonsignificant correlations anywhere between sexting and you may matchmaking pleasure during the the brand new Parker et al. step 3 data, it had been asked one:

H2: Attachment prevention was connected with sexting volume (both words and you can photographs), and you can connection stress could be regarding delivering terms-only sexts (we.age., slutty messages).

H3: Sexting (possibly that have terminology or photographs) one of maried people won’t emerge since a good predictor of dating fulfillment or ambivalence. But not, connection qualities carry out modest the connection anywhere between sexting volume and you can matchmaking fulfillment and you can ambivalence.

In the long run, because the prior research has shown one relationship ranging from sexting and accessory attributes disagree because of the intercourse, 11 gender is actually explored since the a moderator.

Participants and you can process

Users had been part of the Every day Family Existence Venture (DFLP), an ongoing longitudinal study of loved ones lifetime, who had been recruited through three priilies inside Pennsylvania prepared to end up being contacted because of the experts, (b) announcements on the parenting Sites, and you will (c) notices on neighborhood. Data were used of 355 someone (180 wives) from 181 heterosexual household, already way of life with her in the usa, having a minumum of one boy aged five years otherwise young. Members stayed in the next You.S. regions: 52% Northeast, 17% West, 16% Southern, and fifteen% Midwest. Extremely was indeed Caucasian (91%), hitched (95%), had a college education (72%), and you may were not currently planning to university (84%); 58% got one or more kid. Normally, wives was years old (SD = cuatro.42 age; range 20–42 years), husbands was years old (SD = cuatro.98 many years; assortment twenty two–52 years), and you can annual family income is actually $73,900 (SD = $39,500). Participants’ relationships duration ranged away from dos to 23 ages, which have 92% for the a romance of five age otherwise prolonged (Meters = nine.91 ages, SD = 4.06 decades).

Sexting

Sexting was measured via three items using a 9-point scale ranging from 0 = “never” to 8 = “almost hourly.” Participants were asked to indicate how often with their current relationship partner they: (a) “send sexy messages via mobile device,” (b) “talk about sex or intimacy via mobile device,” and (c) “send nude or semi-nude photos via mobile device.” Items a and b correlated highly (r = 0.85, p < 0.001)>

Relationship pleasure

The quality of Relationships Index 21 includes five points evaluating pleasure (elizabeth.grams., “You will find good matchmaking”) toward a good eight-part level (anywhere between step 1 = extremely highly differ” to 7 = “most strongly concur”) and something item evaluating relationship glee towards the ten-part scale (ranging from step 1 = “unhappy” to help you ten = “well happy”). Text is actually revised so you’re able to “partner” and you will “relationship” to have inclusivity. Highest scores reflect higher dating fulfillment (? = 0.96 to possess spouses and you can 0.95 for husbands).