The purpose of this research will be to check out the the fresh character away from dysfunctional relationships philosophy for the the thinking of their matchmaking which have the parents and you may argument resolution practices of late puberty. The newest take to are contains 372 Turkish university students (248 women and you can 124 boys). Social Intellectual Distortions Scale, Parents-Teenage Matchmaking Level and you will Dispute Solution Level were administered to people. The viewpoints, along with philosophy about the being extremely alongside anybody else within relationships factors negative effects had the large correlation with dispute solution behavior. And you may lower correlations was in fact located anywhere between identified datingranking.net/nl/bgclive-overzicht/ moms and dad-adolescent relations and you will impaired matchmaking viewpoints. While doing so, individuals with lowest impaired opinions got way more argument quality practices within their dating as opposed to those with high dysfunctional philosophy.

Cognitive behavioral theory enjoys postulated one to opinion instance irrational philosophy, impaired opinions otherwise cognitive distortions are essential facts toward introduction and continuation out-of dysfunctional routines and emotional conditions in the some one (Beck, 1976; Beck, Hurry, Shaw, Emery, 1979; Ellis, 1962; Walen, DiGiueseppe, Dryden, 1992). Relationship philosophy are considered health generating if they helps individuals’ changes in order to relationship in addition to their personal progress. Eg cognitions reflect insights within the dating (Sullivan Scwebel, 1995). In contrast, dysfunctional relationship opinions was identified as highly exaggerated, rigorous, illogical, absolutist thinking concerning character away from relationship, in the themselves while others in relationsnip (DiGui). Centered on intellectual behavioral concept, irrational or dysfunctional relationships viewpoints enjoys a profound affect troubled relationships (Ellis, Sichel, Yeager, DiMattia, DiGuiseppe, 1989; Epstein, Baucom, Rankin, 1993). Many respected reports concerned about relationship or relationship affairs found that unreasonable relationhip values is actually negatively connected with individuals’ experience in constant romantic or relationship relations. When people hold irrational dating beliefs, they are faster came across and you may adjusted within relations (Addis Bernard, 2002; Cramer, 2004; Debord, Romans, Krieshok, 1996; Epstein, Pretzer, Fleming, 1987 ; Moller Van der Merwe, 1997; Moller Van Zyl, 1991; Stackert Bursik, 2003).

Effect indicated that impaired matchmaking opinions was indeed negatively from the conflicts solution behavior, especially on the focusing on others’ need and rage management during the conflict

The fresh new intellectual design due to the fact used on ily relations (Epstein, Schlesinger, Dyden, 1988). Cognitive-behavioral method of nearest and dearest treatment posit one person’s cognitions regarding the family relations shape its behaviors contained in this family solutions and you can apply to its impact (Smith Schwebel, 1995; Sullivan Schwebel, 1995;). Cognitions pertaining to the family relationships normally direct the individual’s understanding out-of members of the family existence as well as may also form exactly how a man recognizes and you may responds so you’re able to family and incidents inside family life. The content of individuals’ relationships thinking was pivotal during the choosing brand new top-notch their dating (Schwebel Good, 1994). Additionaly, Robin Foster (1989) and you can Robin, Koepke Moye (1990) proposed one good adhelerences so you’re able to unrealistic philosophy regarding the friends carry out head stress and you can render disagreement ranging from family unit members. They assumed one unrealistic values induce mad reactions so you can moms and dads and you may teenage dispute, imploding productive communications or rational problem solving and you will creating reciprocity regarding bad perception and you may choices.

As the mid-eighties, new books in this area provides focused on beliefs on the relationships (Beck, 1988; Eildeson Epstein, 1982; Ellis, 1986; Epstein, 1982; Epstein Eidelson, 1981)

Of many research in the world checked-out the new contributions out of intellectual affairs so you’re able to distressed moms and dads and you can teenagers interactions. Results indicated that disappointed moms and dads and teenagers keep far more irrational relationhip values and argument than nondisstresed mothers and you can kids group (Erytiksel, 1996; Erytiksel Aktin, 2003; Robin, Koepke Moye,1990; Vincent-Roehling Robin, 1986) Morever, Vincent-Roehling Robin (1986) reported that there is high relationship between adolescents’ unreasonable values and you can maternal argument. And get, it was stated that unreasonable relationships viewpoints is actually a serious predictor of understood connection into the dad and you can students which claimed faster connected on the fathers had been holding so much more impaired dating beliefs (Sinclair Nelson, 1998). Reed Dubow (1997) along with checked out the brand new relationship anywhere between mothers’ and you may adolescents’ real communication behavior through the a troubleshooting interaction task and their unreasonable thinking. It learned that mothers’ irrational viewpoints towards adolescent was basically surely about negative correspondence behaviors.