Lamb, M. Age., & Gilbride, K. When you look at the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you will incompatible matchmaking (pp. 33-60). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]

Perceived resemblance and relationship victory certainly relationships couples: A keen idiographic strategy

Lee, L., Loewenstein, G., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Younger, J. (2008). If I am not saying sizzling hot, are you presently very hot or perhaps not?: Physical-elegance ratings and dating tastes as a function of your very own elegance. Psychological Research, 19, 669677. [ Hyperlinks ]

Levinger, Grams., & Rands, Yards. (1985)patibility in-marriage or any other romantic relationships. During the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you can incompatible dating (pp. 309-331). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]

Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Level of ambition. From inside the J. McV. Appear (Ed.), Identity together with decisions disorders (Vol. step 1, pp. 333378). Ny: Ronald Push. [ Links ]

Loving, T. J. (2006). Predicting dating dating future having insiders’ and you may outsiders’ position: Whom and you may what is expected matters. Private Relationship, thirteen, 349-362. [ Backlinks ]

Luo, S., & Klohnen, Elizabeth. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you will relationship quality in newly weds: A couple depending approach. Log of Personality and you can Public Mindset, 88, 304-326. [ Backlinks ]

Madden, M., & Lenhart, A good. (2006). Online dating. Washington, DC: Report towards Pew Sites & Western Existence Endeavor. Recovered , off [ Website links ]

MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Meters. (1999). Assessing the precision away from forecasts on https://lovingwomen.org/sv/blog/japanska-chattrum/ matchmaking relationship: Exactly how and why carry out lovers’ forecasts change from the individuals made by observers? Character and you can Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 14171429. [ Hyperlinks ]

ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing circumstances throughout the initiation off heterosexual relationships. Papers exhibited during the Earliest Global Appointment towards Individual Dating, Madison, WI. [ Hyperlinks ]

Merkle, Age.R., & Richardson, Roentgen.A beneficial. (2000). Digital dating and you may virtual appropriate: Conceptualizing computer mediated close matchmaking. Nearest and dearest, forty two, 187-192. [ Backlinks ]

Montoya, R. M., Horton, Roentgen. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Try actual resemblance essential destination? An effective meta-studies away from genuine and you can imagined resemblance. Log out of Societal and private Relationship, 25, 889-922. [ Hyperlinks ]

Morry, Meters. M. (2005). Relationship pleasure given that a good predictor of resemblance reviews; An examination of one’s destination-similarity theory. Record out of Societal and personal Dating, twenty-two, 561-584. [ Website links ]

Journal out of Social and personal Relationship, 23, 865-880

Morry, M. M. (2007). The fresh interest-resemblance theory one of mix-sex relatives: Matchmaking fulfillment, thought parallels, and you may thinking-helping thinking. Record regarding Societal and private Relationship, 24, 117-138. [ Backlinks ]

Murstein, B. We. (1987). A clarification and you may extension of one’s SVR principle out of dyadic combining. Journal from ily, 44, 929-947. [ Backlinks ]

Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who can splitting up: A fourteen-12 months longitudinal study of black partners and white partners. Log away from Personal and personal Relationships, 19, 179-202. [ Hyperlinks ]

Orenstein, S. (). The fresh new love algorithm Fits believes it’s receive a formula having governing the internet relationship business: A technical strategy to find Mr. or Ms. Right. Organization 2.0 Magazine. Retrieved into the away from [ Backlinks ]

Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Precisely the congruent endure – Character parallels when you look at the people. Identification and you can Individual Differences, 45, 533-535. [ Links ]

Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, R. (2000). Companion preferences: Exactly what properties do someone interest within short-identity sexual and you can long-identity close lovers? Record away from Psychology and you can People Sexuality, twelve, 1-21. [ Hyperlinks ]

Reis, H. T. (1985). The brand new character of self throughout the initiation and you will span of personal communication. Within the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and incompatible relationship (pp. 209-231). New york: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]