The newest survey contains step three parts. Part I included questions off socio-market analysis (age, quantity of education, parity, familial earnings, field, newest marital position, sexual activity, reputation for HPV inoculation, and you will history of unpredictable cervical cancer tumors assessment).

Region II composed of six questions about the target women who might be screened, many years first off, volume, ages or requirements to avoid regarding screening, and methods regarding tests. Just the members that has ever heard out-of HPV would just do it so you’re able to Region III hence analyzed understanding of HPV away from their type of (oncogenic otherwise low-oncogenic), function of alert and you will protection.

Before the studies, new survey out-of region II and you can area III within the Thai adaptation was basically contemplated, chatted about, and you will revised up until consensus one of 20 experts who have been the gynecologic oncologists (particular was indeed people in other synchronous training). The pros ranked every one of 19 concerns once the either ‘relevant’ otherwise ‘perhaps not relevant’. The thing-top Posts Legitimacy Directory (I-CVI) are calculated for every single items, additionally the Stuff Legitimacy List (CVI) is actually computed by firmly taking the average ratio out-of 14 questions relating to information about cervical cancers screening and 5 questions relating to HPV. The newest CVI had been step 1 both for elements of the fresh survey (S1 Dining table). The fresh new reliability is actually checked into the 31 feminine with similar attribute as people. New Cronbach’ leader coefficients towards accuracy were 0.819 to have understanding of cervical cancer examination and 0.907 getting knowledge about HPV.

Studies collection

Towards the go out out-of booked colposcopy, the analysis secretary offered information of your own data towards the feminine who came across inclusion criteria. The women exactly who wanted to engage gave written advised concur and answered the newest questionnaire individually themselves just before continuing to help you colposcopy.

Research amassed for it study was indeed socio-demographic analysis (Area I of survey), experience with cervical disease testing (Part II), and you can experience in HPV (Part III).

Statistical analysis

New solutions of real information on cervical cancer tumors evaluation and you can HPV was in fact examined because of the per item before scoring categorization. Best answer was obtained while the 1 whereas ‘wrong and you can not knowing answer’ is actually obtained 0.

Out of fourteen issues from cervical cancer tests, feminine whose get was ? 10 was basically randomly categorized as the having ‘an excellent knowledge’ usually have been considered as having “negative training”. To own experience in HPV, feminine whose respond to try ‘never been aware of HPV’ https://brightwomen.net/da/tyrkiske-kvinder/ was in fact omitted from the data from HPV education.

From 5 concerns, women whoever rating have been ? step three were considered as that have ‘an excellent expertise in HPV’ otherwise once the ‘bad knowledge’. Off 19 inquiries, women whoever rating had been ? thirteen have been classified while the which have ‘a great full knowledge’ otherwise as the ‘not good total knowledge’.

Every studies had been gathered for the an electronic databases and reviewed having fun with SPSS V.twenty six.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Detailed statistics were used to analyze market research and you may have been summarized as number which have payment, imply with practical departure otherwise median that have assortment. The fresh relationship anywhere between each adjustable and you can knowledge score was in fact assessed having fun with effortless linear regression. Exploratory design was created for the multivariable research plus all of the details possibly connected with the information and knowledge score. New noticed number of analytical benefit are good p-property value 0.05 or less.

Results

Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>